Sitting in the airport on the way home from Atlanta this morning, trying to catch up.
Jim, I have to agree with you on your post except the obviously biased part about not all framers being interested in education....
Maybe I should have said "organized education", but I guess you know that's what I was referring to. Biased? I don't think so. I can assure you there are framers who perceive no need for any form of organized framing education. Many framers do as you suggest, and try hard to educate themselves without the benefit of any vetted guidance. Most of them manage to learn enough to get by, and all of them think they have seen it all, but none of them know how many pertinent details they have missed along the way. The CPF, GCF, and MCPF exams reveal our knowledge gaps. We all have them, you know.
My opinion is that self-education does not yield predictable results. A self-taught framer's "body of knowledge" usually is fat with misunderstandings promoted by misleading wording found in some published product literature. And at the same time, that framer's "body of knowledge" lacks the balanced nutrition of planned learning. In other words, we take in knowledge the way we take in bodily nutrition. Some of us naturally do that better than others, but all of us can benefit from professional guidance.
For example, what shall we say about the self-taught, 30-year framer who, by all accounts, knows his stuff and builds beautiful, protective framing, but still thinks starch paste should stick to plastic? I met him.
We all know framers who still think a solid backer and glazing are bad for framing canvas artworks. And there are many more who have accepted those recommendations, but can't say why or how they benefit the painting. That kind of knowledge is difficult to find without the benefit of organized learning.
...other than giving the test taker a basic understanding on terminology and some skills associated, passing the CPF exam does not at all make you a custom picture framer. There is much more to this than what the CPF exam provides.
True enough, and nobody has said passing the CPF exam is a complete framing education.
...It says you are serious about what you are doing, it does not make you a master...
Also true. Earning the "Master" designation requires building 5 frames according to thoroughly researched preservation standards, being able to givde reasons for every framing provision, and being judged by vetted examiners. Is the MCPF a perfect program? No, but at least an MCPF can point to proven educational accomplishment, which goes way beyond what any self-proclaimed "Master" can attest.