Difference between Fletcher 2000 and 2200, and 2000 vs. Logan 655 (Framer's edge)

Create a Post
R

reidthaler

Grumbler in Training
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Posts
6
OK, time to buy a mat cutter time.

What is the difference between the Fletcher 2000 and the 2200?

I have to opportunity to buy a used 60" Fletcher 2000 for $575 or I could get a new Logan #655 (48") for $490. I don't believe the Fletcher has stops or the support arm. I think 48" is all that I would need as my largest print would be 24x36 and I don't think I would buy mat board bigger than 32x40.

I'm a serious part time photographer, so I really won't be cutting mats for days and hours at a time--probably a few a month (but I like equipment that works well). While the Fletcher is a true professional cutter, might I better be served by the additional features of the Logan (gasp! I hear) and the cheaper price?

What are your thoughts and recommendations?

Thanks!

Reid
 
The 2000 is an older discontinued model, the 2200 is current. It has, mostly, ergonomic improvements over the older ones. Don't know about the Logan other than people informing me that they are not as durable machine.

Having stops is very desireable plus you may need space to accomodate the larger machine.
John
 
Do it right the first time.

reidthaler said:
...I have to opportunity to buy a used 60" Fletcher 2000 for $575 or I could get a new Logan #655 (48") for $490. I don't believe the Fletcher has stops or the support arm. I think 48" is all that I would need as my largest print would be 24x36 and I don't think I would buy mat board bigger than 32x40...
Click to expand...

If I were you I would buy the used 60" Fletcher 2000 unless it is literally falling apart. You can replace any worn parts on it, and you can probably buy a mat guide and stops later, both of which are useful and well worth their prices, new or used.

Logan machines are OK for hobbyists and occasional users, but I would advise against the Logan for professional use. Years ago, my first matcutter was a Logan, which had begun to show signs of wear when I replaced it after about 6 months' use.

Yes, a 60" machine requires more table space. But if you buy a 48" matcutter, you will never be tempted to take in jobs requiring oversize mats. Although oversize jobs are more profitable and popular these days, you would be unable to do the work. Do you want that absolute limitation?
 
I have a 48 Fletcher 2000. I to am a part time framer. Twice I have needed parts, called Fletcher and the parts have been in the mail the next day. Neither time would they let me pay for them. Both times they were small parts, but still, talk about instilling customer loyalty, and I bought the unit used!. Many of the parts available for the 2100 (and I believe the 2200) will fit the 2000 so if it is in reasonable shape that would be my vote...

Bear in mind I only have annecdotal info about Logans, never used one myself.

James
 
Create a Post
Back
Top