I am so glad to hear that others think Kincade is Charlatan!
He IS a marketing genious, and is laughing all the way to the bank, but in no way will I ever acknowledge him as an artist.
I have had countless converstations about his tacktics. One one hand, he is appealing to people who wouldnt otherwise "collect art." And his basic premise is wholesome and altruistic, and really appeals to the general populous in Bible belt areas. I think Every Babtist in Oklahoma owns a Kincade. He has broaded thier horizons a bit about "collecting." And that is good for the art market, typically speaking.
However, he is undermining other artists who are trying to make a living reproducing prints, by flooding the market. He is undermineing his clientelle, who honestly believe that thier print on canvas will apreciate and that they made and investment, only to find out that they couldnt get a dollar for it at a garage sale if they so chose now. He is a lier, making people believe that he personally hand touched their print, (how can one man hand touch 30 million and counting prints...please!). And the story about his his signature being imprinted with his DNA is absolutely rediculous.
I applied with a Kincade gallery in Aspen, and though I was never serious about actually accepting the job, I had to know about their company policies and what lies they expect you to tell to customers.
Any one who tells me that they have a Kincade, I have to sadly say, "I am Sorry, you got suckered into that, you poor thing, I will gladly help you burn it."
I think it is ironic that his images are "so holy" when the creator is obviously NOT. The biggest lie of all.