Thanks, for taking my note in a good spirit.
I did hear that part, but there are better ways to expand a conversation, than saying 'He was wrong', with underlines.
Looking forward to more good chats.
Fine, I'll keep my silence. The issue is closed. Just one final "food-for-thought-question",
& I do not want an answer to it. If someone does or says something in error, there are 2 possible approaches towards same: You can simply walk away, & the error remains, or you can address it, critique it, & yes, critiquing may involve saying that the person was wrong in what they said or did, but you are
not judging/criticizing them by pointing out said errors ("underlining them"): Within any interaction betwixt 2 people, neither party learns thru silence (in person, body-language & expressions may "speak", not so thru written words) --- that, to me, is the basis of a "teaching-learning" experience,
non-judgmental but active (& something I often keep in mind when dealing with teaching/learning of any kind is the Sufi adage, "Even a stone can be a teacher" --- for those ready to learn). Your approach appears vastly different, one more interspersed with silence & nonaction --- so be it.

(One small amendment to what I did in reaction to Wbfay's original comment, specifically
underlining "He was wrong" ---
that was never intended as an emphasis to the error, merely making said occurrence more "visually prominent" within the context (if I
had intended emphasizing it, it would've been
bolded) . For any possible
unintended errors on my part because of same, I apologize, particularly to Wpfay if he's reading this post --- I have nothing but the utmost respect for his knowledge &/or comments &/or him.)