If you are interested

Gail

Grumbler
Joined
Mar 3, 2001
Posts
18
Loc
Tallapoosa,Georgia USA
RCI has a new business. I got a letter today that said I was a valued customer. I believe they are selling glue, tape and CMC parts. I think this is a miracle since this company did not claim enough assets in the bankruptcy court to pay their debts.

------------------
Gail Bridges
Kimacy Frame Shop
Tallapoosa, Georgia
kimacyfr@bellsouth.net
 
hrbrlite,

If I'm doing this right, this link will take you to the full text of the original letter. But be very, very careful. Don't send any money up front, certainly not a check. When you get a chance, you may want to run a search on theis forum for Mat Maestro, iMat and RCI. Eye-opening reading. Contact me if you'd like the names of some individuals who are setting up support systems for Mat Maestros.
http://www.thegrumble.com/framer/ubbs/Forum1/HTML/001866.html

Whoa, just checked my mail and I see you did contact me and I've been remiss. I'll remedy that forthwith. Good luck.

------------------
Ron Eggers, CPF and GNGTA (Grumblers Not Going to Atlanta)
The Total Picture
Appleton, WI http://www.total-picture.com
roneggers@hotmail.com

[This message has been edited by RonEggers (edited August 24, 2001).]
 
I just finished my overdue email response to hrbrlite and I found myself wondering: Do you suppose Marvin Brecht, of RCI notoriety, might be lurking on TG? Lots of industry folks do, most of them honest and forthright. Some of them step forward when they have some compelling need to.

I'm probably one of the most non-confrontational people around. I'm usually the peace-maker. I asked one of our Grumble friends last night if there is ever a good reason to attack someone on TG.

But I've said some unkind things about Marvin. I've heard that RCI's bankruptcy was declined, though I can't confirm that, and that he is set up in business again. This would be a great forum for Marvin to step up and explain what's going on. It's not as if anyone is going to reach into the monitor and grab him by the throat.

I also wonder if I'm still on RCI's reference list.

PS I think it's interesting that Gail just got her letter and some haven't received one at all. I got mine a month ago, and several users received one weeks before that. Maybe Marvin can only buy 10 stamps at-a-time.

------------------
Ron Eggers, CPF and GNGTA (Grumblers Not Going to Atlanta)
The Total Picture
Appleton, WI http://www.total-picture.com
roneggers@hotmail.com

[This message has been edited by RonEggers (edited August 24, 2001).]
 
What does bankruptcy declined mean? He can't go bankrupt and has to pay the creditors anyway?

------------------
Timberwoman
AL
I cut the mat, I pet the =^..^= cat.
 
I guess that means that RCI/iMat gets no protection from the bankrupcy courts and creditors are free to go after them by any legal means. As a practical matter, I don't know if anyone will ever get a dime and RCI, by some other name, will be victimizing people all over again.

This is why we refuse to let this issue die. We're all sick of it, but there are existing Mat Maestro users, and potential Mat Maestro users who haven't heard about all these problems. A year ago I was one of them. I wish I'd been more circumspect.

To date, I have 95 e-mails in a folder from framers who have been victimized by RCI/iMat in one way or another. I could give up my day job and still not be able to respond to all of them in a timely fashion. Never-the-less, if you are a victim, I'd like to hear from you, too.

Ron
 
Unless Marvin failed to follow through on the filing and appearances with the bankruptcy court, the bankruptcy would be declined for the reason that he has assets that would cover the debts. The bankruptcy records are public records.

This, for what it is worth, from my husband, the (very good, ethical) lawyer.



[This message has been edited by Mel (edited August 25, 2001).]
 
My understanding, is that he filed for Chapter 11 personally. And he also filed for Chapter 7 (re-orgnaization) for the business.
Chapter 7 requires a viable business, and a good plan to get out from debt. Aside from the plan being approved, it can either be dismissed or changed to Chapter 11, involuantary liquidation.

I have heard from a creditor that it was denied as 7 and made to 11.

But then again, my info can always be wrong. An actual document would be better.
 
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Gail:
RCI has a new business. I got a letter today that said I was a valued customer. I believe they are selling glue, tape and CMC parts. I think this is a miracle since this company did not claim enough assets in the bankruptcy court to pay their debts.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
First... I know you are one of Marvins most valued customers right?? The same one he threatened to sue for posting all of those "lies" about him and his company. His capacity for forgiveness is quite grand, eh?

Ok guys... Here is the exact words from a copy of the chapter 7 proceedings I received from the US Bankruptcy court in Seattle Washington. Actually from Judge Overstreet's office.
"This matter came before the Court on the written requests of Anita Royce and others for an investigation into the activities and transactions of the debtor in his individual capacity, and as the president and sole shareholder of Regal Crown Industries, Inc., a debtor under Chapter 7 in case number 01-04371. The court makes the following findings:
1. The debtor filed this Chapter 7 proceeding on April 17, 2001. The deadlines for objections to his discharge under Bankruptcy code SS 727 and 523 is September 10, 2001. Nancy James is the duly appointed trustee in this case and has filed a no-asset report.
2. Regal Crown Industries, Inc. ("Regal") filed a Chapter 11 proceeding on April 17, 2001. Mr. Brecht, the debtor herein, is the President and sole shareholder of Regal and is therefore an insider of Regal. Regal's Chapter 11 proceeding was converted to a case under Chapter 7 on June 6, 2001. Bruce Kreigman is the duly appointed trustee in that case.
3. The court has received numerous letters from creditors of Regal alleging that Mr. Brecht engaged in fraud in connection with his operation of the Regal business, both before and after the bankruptcy filing. These creditors do not appear to be listed as creditors in Mr. Brecht's personal bankruptcy proceeding, thus they have not received notice of the time for objecting to Mr. Brecht's discharge.
4. Due to a clerical error, Mr. Brecht was discharged on August 7, 2001 in violation of Bankruptcy Rule 4004(c)(1). By order dated August 23, 2001, that discharge was vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, on the basis of the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows:
A. Pursuant to bankruptcy code S727(c)(2), Nancy James is ordered to examine the acts and conduct of the debtor, Marvin Brecht, to determine whether a ground exists for denial of discharge, including without limitation, any ground under Bankruptcy Code S 727 (a)(7).
B. Nancy James shall move prior to September 10, 2001 pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 4004(b) for an extension of the time to object to Mr. Brecht's discharge as necessary to give creditors sufficient time to exercise their rights under Sections 727 and 523 or to afford the Trustee additional time to complete her investigation under Bankruptcy Code S 727(c)(2).
C. The Trustee shall attempt to determine if there are additional creditors who should be added to the matrix in this case for notice purposes based upon the letters that have been received by the Court in the Regal bankruptcy case.
Dated this 24th. day of August, 2001.
signed: Karen A. Overstreet
US Bankruptcy Judge

This was sent to me and 11 other framers who filed a proof of claim form with the court so our side of this mess could be heard. Up to that point, the court only had Marvin's side of this. By our letters, we have made the judge aware that something other than just a "Poor me, I'm a bad businessman and I need refief from my debts" explanation from Marvin is going on. EVERYONE who has had or is still having problems with their Mat Maestro mat cutter needs to contact the court and make them aware of your problems. This can only help us all in our battle against Marvin and also against the leasing companies who are threatening some of us with suits for the balance on a machine that doesn't work and never did work properly.
Sorry for the length of this grumble, but I feel it is important that you all know exactly what is going on. This is the latest I have received from the court. A couple of framers have contacted the FBI and they have expressed an interest in this case and they are looking into it, also. Feel free to contact your local FBI office with your story as well. I'm calling mine tomorrow. Thanks.



------------------
 
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Marc Lzier:
My understanding, is that he filed for Chapter 11 personally. And he also filed for Chapter 7 (re-orgnaization) for the business.
Chapter 7 requires a viable business, and a good plan to get out from debt. Aside from the plan being approved, it can either be dismissed or changed to Chapter 11, involuantary liquidation.

I have heard from a creditor that it was denied as 7 and made to 11.

But then again, my info can always be wrong. An actual document would be better.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Actually, yes you do have it wrong. Chapter 11 is reorganization and chapter 7 is liquidation.

------------------
 
I was waiting to see if anyone would check assertions.

Thanks for actually reading the numbers.

It is interesting it took this long to be noticed, or at least commented on.

Kinda makes you wonder when you see other authoritiave numbers posted doesn't it?
 
Okay, Marc. I did look at that and think, I'm sure that is the other way around--11 is reorg and 7 is tough s***. So stop messing with us now, or I won't be able to trust anything you say. Actually, it is my own memory I no longer trust.

Framah, is there an address for Nancy James on that document? Might help some MM owners get that information to the court.
 
Framah, is there an address for Nancy James on that document? Might help some MM owners get that information to the court. [/B][/QUOTE]

As a matter of fact, there is. Here it is:
Nancy James
15008 63rd. Dr. SE
Snohomish, Wa. 98296

In case you would want to send anything to the judges chambers:
Judge Karen A. Overstreet
Bankruptcy Judge
315 Park Place Bldg.
Seattle, Wa. 98101

There is also an address for the following:
Donivan R. Irby
Assistant Attorney General
900 Fourth Ave. Suite 2000
Seattle, Wa. 98164

Office of the U.S. Attorney at Seattle
601 Union St., Suite 5100
Seattle, Wa. 98101-3903

Copies of the paperwork I recited earlier were sent to each of the forementioned people so it seems that the U.S. Attorney Generals office has also been notified. Always refer to the case number 01-14371 when corresponding.

Glad to help.



------------------
 
Back
Top