Glass and Canvas

tessa, I was afraid someone would quote that, and last July I thought like that. Because of the conversations here and doing research, I believe otherwise now. Not all the time, mind you. Many customers just will not go for it, and I still don't believe glazing is required in all cases, but at least I've learned since, that there are situations which do, and what I've learned I can pass on to educate my customers with solid evidence to back it up. This dinosaur is evolving. Into what, I'm not sure, maybe a better framer! With an open mind??
 
As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on glazing on oils. Prints on canvas, however...I just got one in that was severly faded. The client brought in a fresh one. I suggested spacers and museum glass, they mentioned Steve Wynn. I mentioned spacers and Museum plexi and my $200 job turned into an $800 job. Draw your own conclusions.
 
I use a lot of floater frames on canvas especially the giclees on canvas and I dont use glazing on those, (I am sure there is a way, there is always a way). After reading the article a few weeks ago I have educated my customers on the new practice and have had mixed results so far. Val I was merely quoting your comment to show my ignorance on the matter as well.
 
The last two people who framed oils asked for glass. Have to admit it was a bit of a surprise. Since they were already sold on glass, museum glass with spacers was an easy upsell. But most customers don't want glass because their sister/uncle/neighbor/teacher told them that that's not the right way to frame an oil.

We just got in an oil from the local university - they want museum acrylic on it. My heart almost stopped when I priced that one.
 
Tessa...has anyone officially welcomed you to the Grumble? Whether or not...welcome to the Grumble! Isn't it awesome what we can learn here? When I first got here, a year ago, I didn't realize how much things had changed in the framing industry, and it scared me to death! I've learned so much here, and every day I look forward to learning more, as well as sharing what works for me. I've also learned that some things haven't changed, and that's comforting too.

I've also learned not to take every little thing here as gospel. There are a lot of "opinions". Everybody has one! Research is the key, and even that is sometimes confusing. I'll keep coming back.
 
You are the first to welcome me. Thanks! glad to be here. I just found the solution to a crazy framing job I was wondering why I agreed to do. So I will most certainly keep using this as a resource for more projects I am sure to agree to do without any clue how to do them. good idea or a bad one?
 
You're in the right place!

You wouldn't be the first, nor the last to take in a job and then ask yourself "How on earth...?"! Spend some time in the archives and you'll find that out! I believe that's (one of the) best purposes of this forum....finding out "how", and the "if" will come with experience.:D
 
yes, I think I will. They are at their Peak right now. (Lots of leaf lookers too) I did however answer many questions today searching through archives and more recent posts. I am very excited about my new found knowledge.
 
I'm gonna be nosey here...watcha working on??
 
Real or hypothetical? ........
The double standard about glazing is stunning. When we sell framing for a $50 poster, it almost always will include glazing. But when we sell framing for a $5,000 painting on canvas, probably not.....

I'd like to know how many of the canvasses we frame are worth more than $300 AND are likely to be hung in a prominent place (not the garage) for more than 5-8 years. (While I know, that know one can value art as a customer, nor predict the time it is in possesion accurrately - I would venture that a majority of custom framers would answer as me - about only 5-10%) If all of these 90-95% of my canvas customers want to "feel" the canvas after I simply stated that it is in your best interest for protection & longevity to glaze with acylic - so be it!

BTW I'd love to see this as a poll! Approximate purchase price of canvasses.
 
Val, I am working on a hand sequined Albanian flag about 3' square. The customer wants it framed and then mounted on a mirror with 3" of the mirror showing around the outside. My thought was to mount wood the same size as the frame and glue it to the mirror, then use the neo magnets (which I learned about on the g) and attach the frame to the mirror that way. Then hang it on the wall using mirror brackets. That way if the glass breaks or whatever it will be a lot easier to get to than if I just glued it. I hope it works out as I have planned.
 
Be sure and post pictures when it's all done...sounds interrrresting!
 
I read this thread with great reinterest because of a recent mentioning of Orton Carberry and his contributions as well as how some felt this concept was NEW or at least new to the Framing industry. Please read this cut and pasted excerpt of Orton's on the same topic and while doing so note that it was posted on TFG and when it was psoted.

Orton


Status: MGF Master Grumble Framer
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Midland, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 369

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the context of media (paintings) on canvas:

There once was a time when it was thought that paintings (oils) on canvas had to "breath" in order to assist in "drying" the paint, and therefore, the verso was not to be covered.

There once was a time when it was thought that canvas art was never to be glazed.

In today's environment, both notions are not valid.

The curing of paints is both a physical process i.e. the evaporation of a solvent, in which the medium establishes a dynamic equilibrium with its surrounding environment i.e. the solvent molecules will move from an area of high concentration (the fresh paint)to an area of low concentration (the atmosphere), and a chemical process, independant from the evaporation process i.e. the curing of the medium in which the medium changes chemically, over time, to a more stable form, similar in some ways to the hardening of concrete. The ratio of curing versus the amount of "hardening" from evaporation of solvents varies with the constituency of the medium.

Covering the verso of a framed canvas with a dust paper, and glazing the recto, may retard the evaporation process, but it will not stop it, because the paper is porous - nor will the practice not stop a medium from curing, because the process is chemical.

There are at least two good reasons for glazing canvas art: protection from atmospheric (airborne) contaminants and protection from mechanical damage.

In our contemporary environment significant airborne contaminants include dust and particulate matter and gaseous compounds e.g.(nitrogen compounds, hydrocarbon compounds).

Acrylic paints are porous, and are susceptible to degradation owing to the open nature of their surface structure even after curing. Oil media remain soft, sticky, and somewhat fluid for relatively long periods of time and are prone to mishandling damage and dust contamination as they cure. Glazing will protect the surfaces of both media as they cure and after they cure.

The nature of paper is such that it is porous and therefore will allow the media's desire to establish a dymanic equilibrium with its surrounding environment. In view of the naturally porosity of paper, the practice of cutting "breathing" aperatures into the dustpaper is redundant and in fact, may be harmful because the openings may admit insects and dust directly to the art.

CCI recommends glazing oil and acrylic works on canvas, and in additon to dust paper, recommends the installation of a robust protective board on the verso to protect the canvas from mechanical damage e.g. hangers, nails, sloppy handling, etc.

A significant added bonus to the practice of glazing plus dustpaper-guardboard is the creation of an effective buffer against rapid temperature and RH changes.

The principal objection to glazing is aesthetic. However, AR or Museum glass will negate that downside.
__________________
Orton

Submitted for your added information by BUDDY
 
...Please read this cut and pasted excerpt of Orton's on the same topic and while doing so note that it was posted on TFG and when it was posted...

Thanks for digging that up, Buddy.

Conservators have known the advantages of glazing & solid backers for years, as the snippet from Orton confirms.

So, why do artists, framers, and owners still think it is wrong to glaze a canvas painting?
 
I agree with the drying issue and trapping humidity,I once installed an abstract expressionist painting from the 60's it was huge but bottom line the yellow paint was still wet!( Don't ask me how I know) the customer lost total respect with me because i should have known that.but fact is it blew my mind.
 
...The principal objection to glazing is aesthetic. However, AR or Museum glass will negate that downside.
__________________
Orton

Submitted for your added information by BUDDY

and price!

_
 
and price!

Price is often an objection in framing, so it is not a unique consideration for canvas art. When a customer complains about the price of framing a watercolor, should we just omit the glass? Probably not.

On the other hand, if a customer insists on framing that watercolor without glass, I guess most of us would do it -- but with an emphatic disclaimer. I suggest that the same strategy would work for glazing canvas paintings.

So long as we know that glazing is good for canvas paintings, and we share that beneficial information with customers, let the chips (and the dollars) fall where they may.
 
What about prints?

Could the same idea be said of framing canvas prints, or would that be unnecessary? Most of the prints are finished with a protective UV guard, but after reading this thread, I would still be inclined to glaze them as well.

For so long I thought you didn't need glazing, because the prints were "treated". But then if anything happened, i.e. moisture, elbows, etc. it would be ruined. I had it where a client brought a piece in because when her friend talked, she spit a little and the ink came right off.

I kinda answered my own question there, but I wanted to feel included in this thread. :)
 
Your client's experience show just why a sheet of glazing material is so
important with such items. One never really knows what was used to create
the image and how it may do. Even plastic coatings may discolor and become
begrimmed, over time.

Hugh
 
A customer comes to your shop to frame a canvas transfer, or a print on canvas, or some other mass-produced wall decor on canvas. That customer is not able to buy original art even from a local artist, so she has spent some small amount of her hard earned bucks on that imitation.

It's quite possible that one of the reasons she purchased that piece on canvas is that she would like herself and others in her home to have a perception that that piece is an original oil…

Currently, the majority of oils in museums and galleries are not glazed. The vast majority of oils/acrylics in private collections are not glazed, also. Thus, at the present time, general public has a notion that the original art on canvas should not be glazed.:shrug:

By offering glazing to mass-produced wall decor on canvas you are not only destroying customer's perception, you are creating the impression to you customer that you are trying to run a bill. And indeed, that mass produced wall decor doesn't need any glazing at all – trends and tastes change, average consumer in States moves every seven years – that “art” eventually find itself on the flee market or in the trash. The wall decor manufacturer's standard UV coating is more than enough.

Instead, play the game your customer wants you to play: suggest a rich polystyrene or MDF molding, nice liner, and even an easel…

Maybe, some time in the future that customer would be able to afford the original, and she will be back in your shop, and then you may offer glazing.
 
...at the present time[/B], general public has a notion that the original art on canvas should not be glazed.:shrug: [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]

Yes, that notion exists, and it is wrong. Worse than that, artists and framers too often have the same mistaken notion.

...By offering glazing to mass-produced wall decor on canvas you are not only destroying customer's perception, you are creating the impression to you customer that you are trying to run a bill...]


If a framer simply adds glazing into the framing without explaining its benefits, a customer could form that wrong impression. So, it is important for framers to understand the benfits, and explain them to customers.

...And indeed, that mass produced wall decor doesn't need any glazing at all – trends and tastes change, average consumer in States moves every seven years – that “art” eventually find itself on the flee market or in the trash...

To the extent that is true, the same would apply to a $35 poster, but how often do we frame those without glazing?

Probably most of the cheap art we frame is intended to be of short term, "decorative" value only. Trouble is, we become fond of certain framed images, and tend to drag them around for decades. Longevity of framed art -- regardless of its purchase price -- has nothing to do with how often the owners move. Most adults can visit their parents' homes and see framed images that were there when they were children. So, a lot of cheap, decorative art lasts a long time.

Shall we assure decorative art's deterioration by saying that glazing is unnecessary, or should we encourage its survival for as long as its owners care to keep it?
 
Why don't we simply educate the customer & let them decide!?!?!?!
 
... Longevity of framed art -- regardless of its purchase price -- has nothing to do with how often the owners move....

Jim, how many times have you moved? I'd venture to guess that 50% of what a person has on their walls is either in the garbage, the garage sale, or at least demoted to a lesser room (ie garage or basement) when they move. Do you really think moving has nothing to do with ownership of wall decor? I know that it did to me when I moved, and about 50% of my re-framing is because people move! I think Bork made some valid points.
 
So how do we feel about matting & mounting oils on canvas instead of stretching them?

After all, most things we glaze are on paper, then there's needlework - that's not paper, it's fabric and it's 'lumpy' - but we don't stretch that across acid laden wooden bars and leave it open to the elements do we? We could do though - we could spray them with some sort of embalming liquid that will get filthy and crack in time, but hey - it can be removed and replaced can't it?

So if we are talking protection from outside elements why are we wanting to seal acidic battens - maybe pine - which LEAKS, into the package?

Would it not be more archival to mount an oil onto a cotton board with archival paste than to knock nails or staples through it onto a support far more acidic than we would use even for a cheap print - whether we use glass or not?
 
Hi John,

Stretchers or strainers are not very damaging as the part that touches the canvas is with the grain, not the end grain where the acids etc. come out.

I've seen lots of examples where the stretcher or strainer actually protected the fabric or paper support, as it acted as a barrier to air pollution.

Also, the tension on the stretcher/strainer holds all in place - fabric has a different expansion/contraction rate than all of the ground and paint layers on it, so the tension helps to stabilize things.

Rebecca
 
we frequently glaze canvases.
For shop-counter customers we routinely ask whether they have open fires for heating (many people do over here in these rural parts) and whether they smoke (yup, we still smoke a lot in the UK) and if the answer to either is a yes, then we recommend they think about the benefits of glazing it.
we are a tourist area as well as a local market town for the area, and if you saw the number of lovely paintings, including irreplacable Newlyn School paintings in some of the local hotels and pubs that have had a finger poked through them, or other damage, from "touchers", cigarette smoke, open fires etc then you'd start to think of conservation in terms of a physical barrier to the public first, and protection from UV and airborne pollution and other conservation issues come next...

If its good enough for the national gallery and the british museum....

And Hi to everyone (new registration)
 
Jim, how many times have you moved?

I'm not sure how that relates, but I've occupied eight houses and seven apartments since high school. Like many others, my wife and I still have a few old, cheap, re-framed items, just because we like the images.

...I'd venture to guess that 50% of what a person has on their walls is either in the garbage, the garage sale, or at least demoted...when they move.... Do you really think moving has nothing to do with ownership of wall decor? I know that it did to me when I moved, and about 50% of my re-framing is because people move! I think Bork made some valid points.?

Originally Posted by Bork:
...And indeed, that mass produced wall decor doesn't need any glazing at all...

Yes, you and Bork both made valid points, as usual. Yes, probably 50% of all decoratrive art is disposed after a decade or so. Yes, probably half of our reframing work is for families moving to new homes -- and redecorating brings some of that, as well.

I disagree with the generalization that decorative art doesn't "need" glazing, and here's why:

1. If 50% of decorative art is disposed after a few years, that means the other half is kept longer. Trouble is, we don't know which half is which. I say it's better to err on the side of longevity, not deterioration.

Having no statistics, my guess is that the number of decorative artworks kept dwindles over a period of about three decades. Some small number of those framed works, regardless of their monetary value, become important images for their owners and remain in their possession longer than that. Customers occasionally bring in decades-old framed calendar art or or faded furniture store prints to be updated. And when that happens, we wish the original framers, as well as the owners, had treated them better.

Case in point: A middle aged woman brought in a faded, cheaply framed print that had been stored in a barn. She bought the best framing we could offer for it. Turns out it had hung in her bedroom throughout childhood. When she came home from college, her room had been remodeled and that framed print was gone. Mom said she threw it away. Some 20 years later, after the parents passed away and the siblings were cleaning up the estate, she found it in the barn. She cried over that neatly-reframed junk art when she came to pick it up.

2. We (most of us, anyway) are in the business of selling value. It is in the interst of the artwork, the owner, and the framer for us to propose the best framing alternatives. If the customer chooses to buy cheaper framing, so be it. However, our job is to educate customers -- as you pointed out, HB -- and encourage them to buy framing designs that endure.

Telling customers that their decorative art does not "need" glazing encourages the opposite and contributes to the quickest demise of the art. It also reduces our revenue and profit, but that may be a secondary issue.
 
...
Telling customers that their decorative art does not "need" glazing encourages the opposite and contributes to the quickest demise of the art. It also reduces our revenue and profit, but that may be a secondary issue.

I agree - & its worth repeating - me thinks.
 
loris ;

If I may be allowed to answer for Tom ( framerguy) ,I think his reply to Ron was a sarcastic exaggeration( tongue and cheek) ,and he knows very well where the gases emanate from. In fact his comment was IMO meant to point out how obvious the answers to these questions are. In fact I know he has seen many discussions on this topic and some can be found by doing a search in the archives of TFG.

In that vein this is a comment made by High Phibbs on this topic in which gas has been discussed. The topic has been discussed further since even he made it. But I know for sure that Tom and well versed framers like him have seen it and know where to find even more info on the topic includeing some misunderstandings that are commonly held by a lot of others in this industry.
BUDDY

Since paintings, like other works of art are
inanimate, none "breathes". The extent to which
recently painted oils should be ventilated will
vary with the constitution and thickness of the
paint layer, but as others have said, oil continues to cure for years. If glass is placed
in front of the oil, and there is a concern about
gases coming out of the paint film, this concern
can be addressed with space left around the edges
or the painting. The varnish layer on the oil
does serve to protect its surface, but many artists prefer to leave their oils unvarnished.
Such paintings can benefit from a glazing material
that has been well-spaced in front of the painting. This is much more necessary when an
acrylic painting is being framed. Acrylic emulsion
paints leave a film that is full of holes (where
the water was when the paint was fluid) and
keeping dust out of those holes is a major headache.

Hugh

Even Hugh's comment indicates that the degree of offgasing can vary dependant on the "CONSTITUTION and THICKNESS" of the individually applied paint. However he gives a method by which this problem can be relived in any case and still apply a glazing. in fact he encourages it.
 
The oil painting emits gasses Framerguy -not the glass! They are trapped between the glass and painting - not good.


How are the gasses trapped?
This is not an airtight package.
 
So what is the minimum space required between the glass and the oil? I like the idea of glazing oil paintings. I even more like the idea of putting a stiff barrier on the back of the framing package. I've only been in this industry for about 7 years, and it's amazing how much has changed in that short amount of time. I remember the looks I got from needleworkers when I first started pushing glass on needlework.... and the comment "Oh, the fabric needs to breathe." And now it's pretty much common practice.

I guess it's only a matter of time for the glazing on oils and such to become common practice.
 
Welcome. Loris

The oil painting emits gasses Framerguy -not the glass! They are trapped between the glass and painting - not good.

Not good? How so?

Yes, offgassing occurs during the drying process of oil paints, gradually diminishing over a period of years. Glazing may slow down the drying process, and conservators say that is good for the paint.

A film may form on the inside of glazing as a result of offgassing, but that is not harmful to either the painting or the glazing. When the film accumulates to the point that it is visible, the fix is to open the frame, clean the glazing, and refit.
 
So what is the minimum space required between the glass and the oil?
I have not heard of a minimum air space. The glazing must not touch any part of the painted surface, so heavy texture or high impasto would require more separation. Also, more air space would provide more insulation, such as the gap in a double-pane window works.
I guess it's only a matter of time for the glazing on oils and such to become common practice.
We're workin' on it.:thumbsup:
 
So what is the minimum space required between the glass and the oil?.........

As Jim Said - the more air the better the insulating value, and I might add, the more air space, the better the circulation and the better "dilution" of the gases from the painting in the air space - which I beleive would lead to less likely the glass would aquire a film on the inside.
 
I found this from Rebecca about Ghost Images on Glazing which was around some time back but it might be relavent to this topic.

thought this might be of interest to some of you - it's about those ghost images that one often finds on the inside surface of glass. It would seem that there are various explanations, depending on what is actually in the frame and/or the composition of the glass.

This is copied from the Conservation Distribution List.


"Date: 18 Jul 2003
From: Niccolo Caldararo <caldararo@aol.com>
Subject: Salt on glass

This is in response to Bill Wiebold's and other comments and questions about ghosting images and salt on glass. This was an area of interest of mine when Walter McCrone brought up the issue of the image on the Shroud of Turin in his criticism of the idea that it was a natural occurrence.

I was investigating transfer images relating the microenvironments inside frames. This was a subject that Margaret Holben Ellis had also been working on and had discussed in her 1987 book on the care of prints and drawings. We often see these as negative images of the art transferred to the glass. I was concerned that this might
result in degradation of the image media, and sought to understand the components of the ghost image.

Ms. Ellis published a very striking image transferred to glass in her book and Marilyn Kemp
Weidner published another remarkable example in her article on the results of poor framing which appeared in Studies in Conservation,
v. 12, n. 1, 1987. I republished both in my article with T.B. Kahle which appeared in Restauro in 1989, v. 4.

Luckily I found that scientists at the Conservation Analytical Laboratory of the Smithsonian had studied this phenomenon and had a
number of reports available from the Lab's library (Padfield, Erhardt and Hopwood, ms).

Their analysis found that the substance
in cases they studied was mainly "...sodium chloride and an organic material with surfactant properties". (probably soap - Rebecca's insertion) The salt was mainly derived
from the salted silk of the framed object.

I thought that in most cases, like those in the images produced by Ellis and Weidner, the
transfer's agency was by the interaction of peroxides and hydroperoxides derived from the degradation of matting materials.


Vincent Daniels remarked in personal communication that such transfers are likely to arise from a drying oil which may explain
why we see such images often on the glass of framed prints.

Niccolo Caldararo
Director and Chief Conservator
Conservation Art Service

------------------------------

Date: 17 Jul 2003
From: Alan Derbyshire <aland@vam.ac.uk>
Subject: Salt on glass

I have also seen crystals and droplets on the inside of portrait miniature cover glasses. I assume that this is due to deterioration of the glass and that the crystals are alkali salt deposits.

This is a well known phenomenon due to the original composition of the glass and environmental conditions.. Due to their hygroscopic nature these deposits can absorb moisture under humid conditions forming droplets
but strictly speaking this is not 'condensation'.

On sealed miniatures the outside of the glass is often cleaned but the inside of the glass--because it is difficult to get at--is often left
undisturbed. As Bill Wiebold points out it is very common on French miniatures, 18th and 19th centuries but these crystals/droplets are also common on English miniatures.

If the condition is extreme it may be appropriate to consider replacing the cover glass as it would
be very difficult to control the relative humidity at which glass deterioration occurs or re-occurs.

This condition should not be confused with crystal formation on the ivory miniature itself, which is a separate phenomenon and due to the formation of magnesium phosphate salt deposits migrating from the ivory under conditions of high humidity. Examples of these crystals have recently been analysed using Raman microscopy.

Alan Derbyshire
Senior Conservator
Victoria and Albert Museum
London

------------------------------

Date: 21 Jul 2003
From: Loren C. Pigniolo <misterpuerh@earthlink.net>
Subject: Salt on glass

The recent discussion of salts appearing on the inside of framed works suggests to me a problem such as has been noted in relation to glass deterioration, especially in daguerreotype cases. The mention of this problem in relation to miniatures strengthens the connection in my mind. It would seem to be worth investigating whether a similar problem might be occurring in this instance.

The patterning in relation to the framed image might be explained by temperature gradients within the package, as discussed by Tim
Padfield in his articles "The Hunt Ball," and its sequel, "How to protect glazed pictures from climatic insult." These articles, and
others, are available at <URL:http://www.natmus.dk/cons/tp/>

I am most interested in what you discover, so please report your findings to the list.

Loren C. Pigniolo
Graduate Student, School of Library and Information Science
San Jose State University, San Jose, California"

Rebecca

[ 07-21-2003, 11:08 PM: Message edited by: Rebecca ]
__________________
"Things are just right once you realize they're never going to be just right." www.fineartconserve.com
 
ok, i am still confused.. i did think oils needed to breathe and that was why there should be no glass on them? i guess this isn't true? i have always glazed with museum glass on acrylic that is unvarnished, but i haven't done it on oils..
i guess i am a dinosaur too? :(
are there other posts about this, or articles i should read?
thanks !
 
STILL confused?

ok, i am still confused.. i did think oils needed to breathe and that was why there should be no glass on them? i guess this isn't true? ...are there other posts about this, or articles i should read?

You could start with the other 90 posts in this ten-page thread. :faintthud:
 
Funny Jim, It is only a 3 page thread for me. I have mine set for 40 posts per page, I hated so many pages........

Sorry for the detour. Carry on!
 
i guess i am a dinosaur too? :(
are there other posts about this, or articles i should read?

(a) Search the archives ... there are many threads on this topic
(b) Invest in a set of CCI notes.
 
No, it's a 10-page thread for me. Wondering why it's so long. Are we stepping on toes? Rocking too many boats? Altering too many minds?? Shaking too many prejudices?? One of the longest in recent memory. Most interesting too, in more ways than one
 
Back
Top