ghosting on glass

Rebecca

SGF, Supreme Grumble Framer
Joined
Feb 28, 2002
Posts
3,338
Loc
Vancouver, B.C., Canada
I thought this might be of interest to some of you - it's about those ghost images that one often finds on the inside surface of glass. It would seem that there are various explanations, depending on what is actually in the frame and/or the composition of the glass.

This is copied from the Conservation Distribution List.


"Date: 18 Jul 2003
From: Niccolo Caldararo <caldararo@aol.com>
Subject: Salt on glass

This is in response to Bill Wiebold's and other comments and questions about ghosting images and salt on glass. This was an area of interest of mine when Walter McCrone brought up the issue of the image on the Shroud of Turin in his criticism of the idea that it was a natural occurrence.

I was investigating transfer images relating the microenvironments inside frames. This was a subject that Margaret Holben Ellis had also been working on and had discussed in her 1987 book on the care of prints and drawings. We often see these as negative images of the art transferred to the glass. I was concerned that this might
result in degradation of the image media, and sought to understand the components of the ghost image.

Ms. Ellis published a very striking image transferred to glass in her book and Marilyn Kemp
Weidner published another remarkable example in her article on the results of poor framing which appeared in Studies in Conservation,
v. 12, n. 1, 1987. I republished both in my article with T.B. Kahle which appeared in Restauro in 1989, v. 4.

Luckily I found that scientists at the Conservation Analytical Laboratory of the Smithsonian had studied this phenomenon and had a
number of reports available from the Lab's library (Padfield, Erhardt and Hopwood, ms).

Their analysis found that the substance
in cases they studied was mainly "...sodium chloride and an organic material with surfactant properties". (probably soap - Rebecca's insertion) The salt was mainly derived
from the salted silk of the framed object.

I thought that in most cases, like those in the images produced by Ellis and Weidner, the
transfer's agency was by the interaction of peroxides and hydroperoxides derived from the degradation of matting materials.


Vincent Daniels remarked in personal communication that such transfers are likely to arise from a drying oil which may explain
why we see such images often on the glass of framed prints.

Niccolo Caldararo
Director and Chief Conservator
Conservation Art Service

------------------------------

Date: 17 Jul 2003
From: Alan Derbyshire <aland@vam.ac.uk>
Subject: Salt on glass

I have also seen crystals and droplets on the inside of portrait miniature cover glasses. I assume that this is due to deterioration of the glass and that the crystals are alkali salt deposits.

This is a well known phenomenon due to the original composition of the glass and environmental conditions.. Due to their hygroscopic nature these deposits can absorb moisture under humid conditions forming droplets
but strictly speaking this is not 'condensation'.

On sealed miniatures the outside of the glass is often cleaned but the inside of the glass--because it is difficult to get at--is often left
undisturbed. As Bill Wiebold points out it is very common on French miniatures, 18th and 19th centuries but these crystals/droplets are also common on English miniatures.

If the condition is extreme it may be appropriate to consider replacing the cover glass as it would
be very difficult to control the relative humidity at which glass deterioration occurs or re-occurs.

This condition should not be confused with crystal formation on the ivory miniature itself, which is a separate phenomenon and due to the formation of magnesium phosphate salt deposits migrating from the ivory under conditions of high humidity. Examples of these crystals have recently been analysed using Raman microscopy.

Alan Derbyshire
Senior Conservator
Victoria and Albert Museum
London

------------------------------

Date: 21 Jul 2003
From: Loren C. Pigniolo <misterpuerh@earthlink.net>
Subject: Salt on glass

The recent discussion of salts appearing on the inside of framed works suggests to me a problem such as has been noted in relation to glass deterioration, especially in daguerreotype cases. The mention of this problem in relation to miniatures strengthens the connection in my mind. It would seem to be worth investigating whether a similar problem might be occurring in this instance.

The patterning in relation to the framed image might be explained by temperature gradients within the package, as discussed by Tim
Padfield in his articles "The Hunt Ball," and its sequel, "How to protect glazed pictures from climatic insult." These articles, and
others, are available at <URL:http://www.natmus.dk/cons/tp/>

I am most interested in what you discover, so please report your findings to the list.

Loren C. Pigniolo
Graduate Student, School of Library and Information Science
San Jose State University, San Jose, California"

Rebecca

[ 07-21-2003, 11:08 PM: Message edited by: Rebecca ]
 
Thank you Rebecca. You're right, it IS an interesting question.

And one to which there does not seem to be a definitave answer.

Not too long ago I replaced the mat and glass on an etching. The image had ghosted onto the glass in perfect detail. It was so good that I considered keeping the old glass and framing it for myself, since I coveted the original artwork.

So what is the source of the salt? The ink that was used in the printing? The wood pulp mat that was on the piece? A combination of the two?

Is there one or more types of media that are more prone than others to the development of this problem? I see it most frequently on etchings and textile pieces. I know that salt is often used to set dyes and make them colorfast.

Just wondering out loud.

Kit
 
Hi Kit -

For textiles, the salt is probably from dyes, and the "organic surfactant" is soap or detergent, again from processing.

For etchings, and other oil based printing ink processes, the image is probably caused by the volatile acids produced by the oils as they oxidize, part of the natural aging process. I haven't read of any analysis of these hazing materials though, so don't know precisely what they are composed of.

Peroxides etc. from bad matting may play some role here, but I don't know if it is a direct one - I've never seen any "mat ghosting" on glass.

Another type of deposit seen on glass can be caused by the deterioration of the glass itself. As I understand it, these would be found on early glass, or maybe even "3rd world" glass which has a bit too much flux (material that makes the raw materials melt at a lower temperature)in it. This type of glass would attract water (hygroscopic) and leach out alkalie salts. I think that's the process anyway!

Rebecca
 
Aha! The plot thickens. Glass deterioration is accelerated by high humidity. This is especially true for semi-sealed situations where the interior side of the glass is exposed to high humidity for extended periods of time.


Again, from the Conservation Dist List:

Date: 28 Jul 2003
From: Stephen Koob <koobsp@cmog.org>
Subject: Salt on glass

I have been away for the past month, but wish to add a few comments concerning the recent messages (Cons DistList Inst. 17:12, 17:13 concerning "salt on glass". First, thanks to Bill Wiebold, Niccolo Caldararo, Alan Derbyshire and Loren Pigniolo for their observations and excellent comments.

This phenomenon is more common than one thinks, and can occur on glass whenever the one side (or part) of a glass is subjected to high humidity for a prolonged period of time. The problem becomes worse if the glass is sealed in some manner and the moisture is trapped against one surface. In these instances, we see the
hydration of glass, and leaching of alkali, as a result of the high humidity.

Not only does this happen to the cover glasses on
daguerreotypes, miniatures, prints and drawings, but it also occurs on the interiors of glass vases, decanters, cover glasses for biological specimens, cover glasses or "crystals" of clocks and watches, underneath labels applied to glass, on the insides of thermopane windows, and even the original 1950's glass pane housings of the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights, recently redone for this very reason.

The primary cause is the high humidity, which over time, leaches the alkali to the surface of the glass. If the humidity is maintained
over a prolonged period, the alkali can be seen as droplets, and eventually will pool or drip, thus creating the "weeping" phenomenon. If the alkali is not removed from the surface it will
eventually attack and dissolve the silica, thus freeing up more alkali, and causing the glass to develop cracks, or "crizzling".

Fluctuations in humidity can result in the glass cracking further, and/or the droplets drying out and forming "salt crystals".

As stated in previous postings, there is considerable documentation of this phenomenon, and two other references to note are:

Brill, R.H.
"Crizzling--A problem in Glass Conservation
Conservation in Archaeology and the Applied Arts, Stockholm
Congress, London, IIC, 1975, pp. 121-134

and

Brill, R.H., Hanson, B., and Fenn, P.M.
"Some Miscellaneous Thoughts on Crizzling"
Proceedings of the XVIIIth International Congress on Glass, San Francisco, July 1998.

This deterioration phenomenon can occur in stable glasses, owing to the microclimate created, but we see it much more commonly in
16th-19th century glasses that have unstable compositions (usually low lime, high alkali).

Current research also indicates that the problem can be exacerbated by airborne pollutants, such as those found in wooden storage cabinets.

Interestingly, the glass, or side
of the glass (as in a cover glass or frame) that is NOT exposed to high humidity generally does not show this problem, simply because air movement and occasional cleaning prevent it from happening.

Moderately low humidity, around 40-45% virtually stops the weeping/crizzling, but this is difficult to achieve in private
collections. The humidity should never be dropped below 30%, as glasses that have already begun to hydrate and crack, will develop even worse cracking.

Stephen Koob
Conservator
The Corning Museum of Glass
One Corning Glass Center
Corning, NY 14830
607-974-8228
Fax: 607-974-8470"

Now isn't that interesting! I have to say that I haven't seen this weeping/crizzling - possibly because I've always lived in relatively dry areas. Is this something those of you in humid climates have encountered?

Rebecca
 
Mr. Koob has added some extremely important information to a topic which, fortunately, Rebecca
has brought to everyone's attention. When glass is
made, sodium is added to the silicon dioxide to
create the chemistry that gives the glass its form. In the past, so much sodium may have been
added that it leached onto the surface of the
glass is large enough amounts that it drew water
to itself and formed the "tears" of weeping glass.
When enough sodium had left the glass it cracked
and eventually fell apart. Potassium is another
material that was used in glass making that can
come to the surface and form salts.
Once the is sodium on the surface of the glass,
any source of chlorine, paper bleaches, ink
components, etc. can donate the final component
of the salt.
When a frame is hanging on a damp wall, the humidity in the frame is likely to be higher than
that of the room. This would give us the R.H.
differential to which Mr. Koob refers as the
engine that accelerates the accumulation of the
salt. Here we have another reason to keep the humidity in the frame down.

Hugh
 
A question - Is the UV blocking coating on conservation glass therefore valuable for an additional reason? Or maybe the anti-reflective coating on AR glass?

Pat :D
 
AR coatings comprise layers of metallic compounds
and silicates, while most UV coatings are polymer
based. That should mean that they would not react
the same way in response to this issue, but just
what one should expect is not clear. Neither sort
of glass has been in service long enough to show
clear responses to situation, so we must keep our
eyes peeled. Unframing is an invaluable teacher
for questions of this type.

Hugh
 
Back
Top