stickybubble
Grumbler in Training
Hello, I have been told by a (rather angry) artist that I bought a picture from that it should be framed without a mat and with the paper in direct contact with the glass.
He says that this is because air will destroy the colour somehow and that this is how coloured pencils are supposed to be framed.
I have never heard this before and so far googling has turned up nothing, in fact the opposite. I have had pictures stick to glass before so I try to always use mats now. However, he insists that I re-frame the picture.
It's not a big deal, it's just a cheap frame, but I really am curious about where he got his information or if there is some misunderstanding going on.
The pencils in question are caran d'ache.
I just had to take the back off the frame to check that so I may as well redo it now. However I will also do a specific google search in case there really is something strange about caran d'ache.
I am thinking that somehow he misunderstands what the problem is with UV light? Or perhaps he read very deeply into the subject and came to this conclusion himself?
Can anyone help me understand this please? Like I said it's not a big problem, I'm just a bit confused (and to be honest a little worried that in 10 or 20 years the picture will be ruined because it's stuck to the glass).
Thanks everyone.
edit: I have emailed caran d'ache to see what they say, but it takes companies a long time to reply usually
He says that this is because air will destroy the colour somehow and that this is how coloured pencils are supposed to be framed.
I have never heard this before and so far googling has turned up nothing, in fact the opposite. I have had pictures stick to glass before so I try to always use mats now. However, he insists that I re-frame the picture.
It's not a big deal, it's just a cheap frame, but I really am curious about where he got his information or if there is some misunderstanding going on.
The pencils in question are caran d'ache.
I just had to take the back off the frame to check that so I may as well redo it now. However I will also do a specific google search in case there really is something strange about caran d'ache.
I am thinking that somehow he misunderstands what the problem is with UV light? Or perhaps he read very deeply into the subject and came to this conclusion himself?
Can anyone help me understand this please? Like I said it's not a big problem, I'm just a bit confused (and to be honest a little worried that in 10 or 20 years the picture will be ruined because it's stuck to the glass).
Thanks everyone.
edit: I have emailed caran d'ache to see what they say, but it takes companies a long time to reply usually
Last edited: