Baer Charlton
SPFG, Supreme Picture Framing God
It's not often that you get a crash coarse on ethics vs personal feelings from a highly accoladed law professor, but I did over lunch yesterday and it was as good as lunch with Bob Carter. So I thought I would massage the fuzzy sponge ball I'm using for a brain and pass this along.
We had been talking about other things, and the statement of framing a refusing to frame a photo of Hitler in a parade, a 9 year old boys first deer kill photo, etc etc. (I forgot at the time the umbilical cord discussion.... "the eeuw factor"). So the professor thought about it for a second then stated that he understood the moral right of refusal, but ask if I was open to wandering down a rabbit hole with him. (I checked, we weren't in Milwalkie and he wasn't tapping his foot so I felt safe.)
We started with and obviously emotionally charged item: a hand gun.
Would you frame it?
Customer comes in with a service revolver, badge and newspaper clipping about a cop getting shot.
"These were mine, when I retired, and that (news clipping) was my last case that retired me."
Would you frame it?
You scan the clipping and find out that the cop shot and killed the two robbers after he was almost fatally wounded.
Would you frame it?
You scan the clipping and find out that the cop shot and killed the two robbers after he was almost fatally wounded, bringing his total career kills with that revolver to a round dozen.
Would you frame it?
NOW, lets shift the ownership a bit.
The gun was the one used to rob the store, and almost fatally wounded the shop owner, who is your customer. The badge belonged to the cop that was robbing the store.
Would you frame it?
OK, as promised, here is the silk scarf and the real rabbit hole.
Premis: Customer walks in with a silk scarf. Nice colors but nothing that is spectacular. Not a "Designer" scarf, just a run of the mill 6,000,000 sold through JC Penney's kind of scarf.
Would you frame it?
To get a feel for how to frame it you ask about the story behind the scarf.
"It belonged to my mother."
Would you frame it?
"It was the scarf my mother was wearing when she died."
Would you frame it?
"It was the scarf my mother was wearing when she was killed."
Would you frame it?
"It was the scarf my mother was wearing and strangled to death with."
Would you frame it?
[Aren't you glad you ask these wonderful open-ended questions...?]
Last step and into the rabbit hole.....
"It was the scarf my mother was wearing, that I used to strangle her to death."
Would you frame it?
"It was the scarf my mother was wearing, that I used to strangle her to death, and I want to frame it to remember he by."
Would you frame it?
"It was the scarf my mother was wearing, that I used to strangle her to death, as well as the other nine members of her tea party group, and I want to frame it nice to remember that day."
Would you frame it?
Sorry about the euw fractor... but as a lawyer he has seen worse in the court rooms.
He had a few other things for me, but these were stand outs. There are many things that we don't really think about, that have tremendous emotional and ethic or cultural cache, some have appeared here on the boards and even photos in the Frame Design section. In certain context these seemingly innocuous items can be nuclear bombs to certain framers.
These may or may not be extreme, but I know of a few of these happening. We framers come from very diverse backgrounds, and bring those background belief systems, ethics, morals, and other baggage with them, where others wouldn't be effected. For instance:
Piece to be framed Framer
Jimmy Hendrix's guitar Jehovah Witness or KKK member
photo: 9 yr olds first kill Vegan
Maplethorp original of nude Evangelical
Nude wedding photos for gay couple Evangelical, JW, KKK (oh, did I mention it's a inter-racial marriage?)
Photo of a Kermarouge gang Cambodian immigrant
Birthing photos ZPG activist
War memorabilia Pacifist
Animal skin art My wife, PETA, Green Peacer etc
and the list can go on forever.... just thoughts on an insomniac night.
Let the rantings, thoughts, ideas, and ideals begin.
We had been talking about other things, and the statement of framing a refusing to frame a photo of Hitler in a parade, a 9 year old boys first deer kill photo, etc etc. (I forgot at the time the umbilical cord discussion.... "the eeuw factor"). So the professor thought about it for a second then stated that he understood the moral right of refusal, but ask if I was open to wandering down a rabbit hole with him. (I checked, we weren't in Milwalkie and he wasn't tapping his foot so I felt safe.)
We started with and obviously emotionally charged item: a hand gun.
Would you frame it?
Customer comes in with a service revolver, badge and newspaper clipping about a cop getting shot.
"These were mine, when I retired, and that (news clipping) was my last case that retired me."
Would you frame it?
You scan the clipping and find out that the cop shot and killed the two robbers after he was almost fatally wounded.
Would you frame it?
You scan the clipping and find out that the cop shot and killed the two robbers after he was almost fatally wounded, bringing his total career kills with that revolver to a round dozen.
Would you frame it?
NOW, lets shift the ownership a bit.
The gun was the one used to rob the store, and almost fatally wounded the shop owner, who is your customer. The badge belonged to the cop that was robbing the store.
Would you frame it?
OK, as promised, here is the silk scarf and the real rabbit hole.
Premis: Customer walks in with a silk scarf. Nice colors but nothing that is spectacular. Not a "Designer" scarf, just a run of the mill 6,000,000 sold through JC Penney's kind of scarf.
Would you frame it?
To get a feel for how to frame it you ask about the story behind the scarf.
"It belonged to my mother."
Would you frame it?
"It was the scarf my mother was wearing when she died."
Would you frame it?
"It was the scarf my mother was wearing when she was killed."
Would you frame it?
"It was the scarf my mother was wearing and strangled to death with."
Would you frame it?
[Aren't you glad you ask these wonderful open-ended questions...?]
Last step and into the rabbit hole.....
"It was the scarf my mother was wearing, that I used to strangle her to death."
Would you frame it?
"It was the scarf my mother was wearing, that I used to strangle her to death, and I want to frame it to remember he by."
Would you frame it?
"It was the scarf my mother was wearing, that I used to strangle her to death, as well as the other nine members of her tea party group, and I want to frame it nice to remember that day."
Would you frame it?
Sorry about the euw fractor... but as a lawyer he has seen worse in the court rooms.
He had a few other things for me, but these were stand outs. There are many things that we don't really think about, that have tremendous emotional and ethic or cultural cache, some have appeared here on the boards and even photos in the Frame Design section. In certain context these seemingly innocuous items can be nuclear bombs to certain framers.
These may or may not be extreme, but I know of a few of these happening. We framers come from very diverse backgrounds, and bring those background belief systems, ethics, morals, and other baggage with them, where others wouldn't be effected. For instance:
Piece to be framed Framer
Jimmy Hendrix's guitar Jehovah Witness or KKK member
photo: 9 yr olds first kill Vegan
Maplethorp original of nude Evangelical
Nude wedding photos for gay couple Evangelical, JW, KKK (oh, did I mention it's a inter-racial marriage?)
Photo of a Kermarouge gang Cambodian immigrant
Birthing photos ZPG activist
War memorabilia Pacifist
Animal skin art My wife, PETA, Green Peacer etc
and the list can go on forever.... just thoughts on an insomniac night.
Let the rantings, thoughts, ideas, and ideals begin.