Bill Henry-
Brussel Sprout Connoisseur
A new customer came in, yesterday, with two open edition prints dry mounted onto regular (non acid-free) foam board.
Her story was that she had commissioned both to be framed by another frame shop – a competitor with whom we do not share cordial relations. The quote she received was ~$500 for both – from her description of the frames, a little high from our perspective, but not outrageous. She plunked down a $250 deposit.
First, she had been told that the moulding was out of stock, then after 5 months of waiting, that it had been discontinued. Annoyed at the wait, she went to claim her two prints. The only work that had been done on this order was the dry mounting. Using our standard price list, we estimated that, had we mounted these in a similar manner, we would have charged her $31.40 for one and $25.70 for the other.
When she tried to reclaim part of her deposit, this frame shop told her that they were going to keep the whole $250. She was told that that was to cover to cost of the dry mounting charge and the storage for the five months. They did not return a dime.
As she was relating the story, she alternated between being angry and a bit weepy. She feels strongly that she was treated very badly. Her husband wants to take them to Small Claims Court to recoup this loss.
I am not soliciting comments on how badly you believe this frame shop treated this customer (I think we will all agree on that), but, rather, would you aid her in trying to recover her deposit? Would you draft a letter which she could use in Small Claims Court to debunk the claim that it cost $250 to dry mount two medium sized prints?
Although it may sound self serving (I am, after all, getting the framing job), I am leaning towards doing so. I really think she got screwed. How would you guys handle this?
Her story was that she had commissioned both to be framed by another frame shop – a competitor with whom we do not share cordial relations. The quote she received was ~$500 for both – from her description of the frames, a little high from our perspective, but not outrageous. She plunked down a $250 deposit.
First, she had been told that the moulding was out of stock, then after 5 months of waiting, that it had been discontinued. Annoyed at the wait, she went to claim her two prints. The only work that had been done on this order was the dry mounting. Using our standard price list, we estimated that, had we mounted these in a similar manner, we would have charged her $31.40 for one and $25.70 for the other.
When she tried to reclaim part of her deposit, this frame shop told her that they were going to keep the whole $250. She was told that that was to cover to cost of the dry mounting charge and the storage for the five months. They did not return a dime.
As she was relating the story, she alternated between being angry and a bit weepy. She feels strongly that she was treated very badly. Her husband wants to take them to Small Claims Court to recoup this loss.
I am not soliciting comments on how badly you believe this frame shop treated this customer (I think we will all agree on that), but, rather, would you aid her in trying to recover her deposit? Would you draft a letter which she could use in Small Claims Court to debunk the claim that it cost $250 to dry mount two medium sized prints?
Although it may sound self serving (I am, after all, getting the framing job), I am leaning towards doing so. I really think she got screwed. How would you guys handle this?