Tommy P
MGF, Master Grumble Framer
I have framed two things lately with Tru-Vue AR glass. The first is in the shop on display. Was not that impressed with it's AR properties.....
The second is the one that has me perplexed.
Customer brings in a framed piece with a single mat that is glazed with non-glare. He has never liked the piece (bought direct from the artist) and believes it is because of the "muddy" look from the glass. But he hates reflection. He sees my little display box. You know, the one from TV that has the gold tassle showing regular and museum glass. I end up selling him, as a replacement for the non-glare, a 25 x 36 piece of AR from TV. Not museum with 97% UV pro but AR with something like 76% UV protection. I charge him $185.00 to do this.
The problem is that for the money neither he nor I think the finished piece is that great! He took it back to work to hang in his office (lawyer) and may bring it back if it looks like it did in my shop. I did not oversell it's purpose!
Am I missing something with an AR glass? Am I wrong in thinking that TV AR and Museum are no different in regards to the anti-reflection properties of each? UV percentage is different but is that it? And there still is signifacant reflection, although it is "bluer"! For the cost of these products they should be like the **** little tassle box. Invisible!!
WHAT AM I NOT GETTING!! AM I DOING OR UNDERSTANDING SOMETHING WRONG??? (sorry for shouting)
I have seen others expound on the delights and wonders of AR glass....help me see the light.....without reflection!
The second is the one that has me perplexed.
Customer brings in a framed piece with a single mat that is glazed with non-glare. He has never liked the piece (bought direct from the artist) and believes it is because of the "muddy" look from the glass. But he hates reflection. He sees my little display box. You know, the one from TV that has the gold tassle showing regular and museum glass. I end up selling him, as a replacement for the non-glare, a 25 x 36 piece of AR from TV. Not museum with 97% UV pro but AR with something like 76% UV protection. I charge him $185.00 to do this.
The problem is that for the money neither he nor I think the finished piece is that great! He took it back to work to hang in his office (lawyer) and may bring it back if it looks like it did in my shop. I did not oversell it's purpose!
Am I missing something with an AR glass? Am I wrong in thinking that TV AR and Museum are no different in regards to the anti-reflection properties of each? UV percentage is different but is that it? And there still is signifacant reflection, although it is "bluer"! For the cost of these products they should be like the **** little tassle box. Invisible!!
WHAT AM I NOT GETTING!! AM I DOING OR UNDERSTANDING SOMETHING WRONG??? (sorry for shouting)
I have seen others expound on the delights and wonders of AR glass....help me see the light.....without reflection!